CinnaFuego Toast Crunch is Cinnamon Toast Crunch’s evil twin. I mean, new product. It’s like the Cinnamon Toast Crunch you know and love, but spicy!
If you’re a big fan of spicy cinnamon-flavored things, this might be for you! Is this an improvement on regular Cinnamon Toast Crunch or is this an update that failed to improve upon a flawless classic?
The following article contains affiliate links that may generate a small commission to us when you make a purchase through the link. Learn more about how we work with affiliates here.
CinnaFuego Toast Crunch is very strange to me. It tastes like cereal coated in Hot Tamale dust. It comes in a bag like chips, but eating it like chips feels wrong because it’s cereal.
That being said, I can’t imagine you’d want to eat these out of a bowl with milk. Cold, spicy, cinnamony milk just doesn’t sound appealing. And in the morning? You would not be able to leave your house after having a bowl of this for breakfast. This tastes bad—and it’s a bad concept.
Credit: Sarah Demonteverde / Cinnamon Toast Crunch
Jordan is an L.A.-based writer and comedian who believes all food should come with extra sauce. When they're not writing for Sporked, Jordan is at the movies or sharing an order of french fries with their elderly chihuahua.
Thoughts? Questions? Complete disagreement? Leave a comment!
While I’m sure they are pretty nasty and eating more wouldn’t change that fact, I don’t see the point of doing a taste test of a new product and then only eating one tiny piece before giving it a rating. Not to mention if something is a product that is intended to be eaten a certain way, i.e. a cereal in milk, then I think you owe it to taste it that way, regardless of your assumption that they must have meant for it to be eaten as a snack. Pretty sure they would have marketed it that way if that’s what they wanted.
While I’m sure they are pretty nasty and eating more wouldn’t change that fact, I don’t see the point of doing a taste test of a new product and then only eating one tiny piece before giving it a rating. Not to mention if something is a product that is intended to be eaten a certain way, i.e. a cereal in milk, then I think you owe it to taste it that way, regardless of your assumption that they must have meant for it to be eaten as a snack. Pretty sure they would have marketed it that way if that’s what they wanted.